Today, when I was looking at the comments, I noticed that a perspicacious reader asked the question which is most important to me! Wow, I guess I had better answer that, but it is going to take more than a few sentences, so I might as well make it into a whole blog post.
Before we get to this question and answer, let’s provide a brief high-level overview of Ferrebeekeeper’s weltanschauung.
My philosophy of life is premised on a single transcendent belief. Earth life must evolve and move into the cosmos like the hundreds of millions of fertilized eggs of a great sunfish disseminating through an ocean of stars.
Humankind needs to put aside tinpot dictators, idiotic religious wars, disposable plastic consumer goods, luxury vehicles, and all of our other (horrible) favorite things and dedicate ourselves wholeheartedly to this task or else, before you know it, everything is going to look like the opening scene of “Wall-E” and our chance will be gone. In fact the opportunity is passing us by right now as you read this and everybody talks about 5G phones, Nipsey Hussle, and Jared Kushner.
Yet one of my stubborn readers looked at this premise and asked “why?”. To be exact they said “Can you explain your viewpoint that humans must become space travelers for redemption? To me, it seems that would be a kind of interplanetary metastasis…”
If you had an adult bull elephant stuffed in your Manhattan studio apartment it would seem like a nightmarish monster, but out on the veld, the elephant’s habits would make sense, and its beauty, strength, and noble nature would become apparent. Humankind has become like the elephant in that scenario (I really think we are more like 7.5 billion giant smart termites, but bear with me). We are meant to explore and build at a stupendous scale, but we can’t because we have used all available resources to the point that we are unmaking the complicated webs of life which all eukaryotic Earth life relies on (and maybe because we are hijacked by our own primate nature, too). We can’t keep doing what we are doing. We will destroy ourselves and countless other living things. Our hideous fall might even reset life back to a point from which it could never properly attain its complexity and beauty (I am speaking of all known Earth life here–for I think it is all one thing).
We can’t let go and turn back either. The ultra-competitive world we have made does not work that way. Even if America collectively says, “we chose to not compete, we will close our borders, dream of past greatness, and eat our young” China or India will come sprinting up with new dreams of global empire. Even if we all became organic free-range hunter-gatherers it wouldn’t work.
Yet the things we truly need in order to flourish–space, energy, and freedom from the dreadful hegemony of other people’s idiocy–are super abundant in the larger universe. Imagine a future where Earth is a protected park and we hover above it like dark angels carrying out crazy cosmic wars and far-flung projects and warped super experiments and doing whatever we want…with the stipulation that anyone or anything which threatens Earth is instantly subject to our collective wrath.
I am not sure any of this is possible. In fact it seems like getting back to the moon may be beyond us to say nothing of building flying cities in the atmosphere of Venus or torus colonies orbiting around Jupiter. Yet those things are at least theoretically in the realm of possibility. Traveling beyond the solar system may truly be impossible, even if we built worthy superhuman thinking machines as our offspring and successors (coincidentally I never promised the answer to this question would be easy or even sane).
But I think the reader’s fundamental moral question remains unanswered. If humankind is so savage and dark, would we not bring our rapacity and carelessness with us no matter where we go? Inventing tools and language never made us better. Sailing across the great oceans never taught us compassion. We are the same tragic fire-wielding apes as always. It takes real imagination to conceive of a human starship decelerating into Fomalhaut or orbiting Wolf 1061C, yet it takes no imagination whatsoever to imagine the political appointee in charge of such a craft looking at his “S.M.A.R.T.” terraforming spreadsheet, shrugging, and pushing a button to wipe out the cowering Fomalhautians or the little adorable Wolflings. “Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely”...that Fomalhault branch of Goldman Sachs won’t build itself if we wait around to determine whether the natives are delicious or not! (let me know if I have captured your thinking, hooftales).
My initial answer was that it is necessary to move beyond Earth…because we are so violent and disorganized that we are dangerous to ourselves and others–a cancer, like hooftales said. But, although in moments of duress, I sometimes think of humans as baboons with motor cars, I don’t think of us a cancer. We are not outside of the web of nature: we are part of it. An elephant in a tiny coop would be a travesty, but elephants are magnificent and sympathetic. Humankind is having an awkward adolescence to be sure, but I don’t think we have fully manifested as ourselves yet.
Let me answer a different way. Bamboos form clonal colonies. These giant grasses are intrusive, fast-growing and aggressive plants. Sometimes a single bamboo will take over a whole region–almost the entire forest is one connected living thing. These bamboo can live for a long period–40 to 130 years–but when they flower, the whole clonal colony flowers. In some species, the whole species flowers…no matter where they are in the entire world. Then they produce seeds/fruit called bamboo rice.
And then they die.
Whole forests die in a short time, sometimes causing starvation and mayhem to other living things that rely on the bamboo. Sometimes a whole bamboo species will die off and all of its offspring are so different that they aren’t even the same thing. But then they grow anew–bigger and better and more competitive and they create whole new forests.
![bamboo-flowering-rats[6]](https://ferrebeekeeper.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/bamboo-flowering-rats6.jpg?w=490)
A bamboo flower rat
Not all flowers bloom (just ask the beheaded crocuses in my back yard) but we must try with all of our might to carry the precious seed of life into the heavens. If we can’t do that–if, perhaps, it can’t be done–at least our striving will not have been for nothing. And if we succeed…well… to live in the boundless abyss of emptiness all together in great fragile terrariums that could die if we get a wire crossed, we will have to truly change. I for one am heartily sick of what we have been doing lately and I relish the challenge. What about you? Do you want to go on a colossal multigenerational adventure to the stars themselves, or do you just want to sit here eating snack packs while we use up the planet?
8 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 3, 2019 at 5:43 PM
hooftales
Thank you so much for honoring my question with such a thoughtful (and thought-provoking) reply! You seem to have understood my concerns with the idea of humans taking insatiable and unbalanced appetites into the cosmos.
There are so many interesting points in your reply and i would love to continue the conversation — by trying to explain why I feel the cancer analogy is apt, for example. Does blog etiquette allow that sort of thing?
April 3, 2019 at 10:04 PM
Wayne
Of course! Explain away. And anyone else should feel free to jump in too. I think I have a sort of inkling what you mean about how humans are like a cancer already, just from listening to a very very rich financier talk about the economy, but please explain your perspective!
April 4, 2019 at 8:35 PM
hooftales
i had not thought about listening to a very very rich financier talk about the economy as a way to approach the cancer analogy, but you’re right, it definitely is! And if a financier can help us understand cancer, perhaps it’s not too much of a stretch that a retired veterinary pathologist can speak about philosophy?
To begin, consider that an organism (plant, animal, fungus, etc) is a collection of many different types of cells, which, in health, cooperate with each other to keep the whole organism in balance.
obviously there are a lot of diseases that can disturb the balance of health, but what makes cancer special (what defines cancer) is that it is an uncoordinated, purposeless growth of cells that no longer ‘know’ how to do their normal jobs. Cancer cells have “forgotten” how to do anything except divide and live for themselves. they push normal cells out of the way and commandeer the organism’s resources for themselves.
so in my analogy, the Earth is a living organism made up of many different cells (species of living things) as well as inanimate matter.
incidentally: we tend to think non-living = unimportant, but the inanimate stuff is the fuel that feeds life. you can’t value the candle flame unless you value the wax that’s burning, right? so the minerals, water and air that make up the Earth are sacred, too, if Life is sacred. but i digress…
to me, the human species has been acting like a cancer for a while now (how long exactly is debatable) but here’s the thing: cancers arise and go into remission “all the time”. So I have hopes that humans can go into remission too: if we realize what we are doing and chose to stop doing it!
in case you’re wondering: i see the human species’ “job” on Earth as trying to reduce suffering. currently our technology has outpaced our wisdom/ humanity, and we are focusing on postponing human death, at the expense of everything else, so we’re actually increasing the amount of suffering in the world as far as i can see. but that could change if enough people started thinking about it. i admit it doesn’t seem likely but this blog has given me renewed hope!
A key concept for me is the acceptance of death. We call it the “life cycle” but we might as well call it the “death cycle”, because you can’t have one without the other. In a healthy organism, cells “know” when it’s time to check out ( it’s called apoptosis or “programmed cell death”) but cancer cells have forgotten how to die. on a planetary level, we are all alive at the expense of something else. so you can’t “chose life” without chosing death, too. Hmmmm. maybe inanimate is where it’s at in the long run!
thanks for the opportunity to write about this.
April 5, 2019 at 12:08 PM
Wayne
Your insight that the Earth is a living organism made up of many different cells is a profound one. I have tried to tease this epiphany with writings about about tunicates, clonal colonies, lichen, and eusocial insects. Unfortunately the level at which consciousness is located, seems to occlude a larger understanding of the human superorganism for many hive-units (or “people” as we call them).
To my perspective (hahaahahaha), the great communications revolutions of human history–language, writing, the printing press, telegraphs, radio, and the internet–reflect an evolving hive consciousness for addressing the sort of macro-concerns we are talking about. Unfortunately, scientific language is ill suited to the abstruse nature of this dialogue. Religious language is, of course, perfectly suited since religion is the dominant form of hive consciousness which needs to be supplanted or updated, however this is a daunting project!
Your intelligent comments remind me that I need to look more a cellular biology, which is where many of the real breakthroughs concerning what Earth life really is (and can be) are likely located. Unfortunately, I am no scientist, and everything at that level is so chemistry-based as to make it hard for me to understand much less explicate. One of my favorite books of philosophical musings “Live of a Cell” takes this approach to these questions (although the authors opinions take a somewhat anecdotal and cellular form in their own right).
Additionally, I forgot to include the link to the blog post about that very very rich financier. Boy my opinions about personal wealth have deteriorated since those days, but it is still a good proximate overview of the insights which you intuited just by thinking about financiers.
April 4, 2019 at 1:03 AM
eub
Have you read the James Tiptree novella “A Momentary Taste Of Being”?
April 4, 2019 at 12:04 PM
Wayne
I have not, but thank you so much for the suggestion. Is it a novel of space diaspora gone right? or wrong?
April 5, 2019 at 4:22 PM
hooftales
it’s so true that science doesn’t lend itself to philosophy…. it can tell you how things happen but not why. that’s why the world needs people like you who want to understand both the “seen and the unseen”.
April 10, 2019 at 10:57 PM
Wayne
Aww…you are too kind, hooftales. I think most scientists have a penchant for philosophy, though. It is asking why which brings them to the field to begin with.