February is Black History month! While other, better-informed sources have covered the biographies and histories of recent African American luminaries, we are stepping far back in time (and far away on the map) to find a subject for this post. This (conveniently) spares us from looking into the nightmarish Atlantic slave trade and the centuries of associated injustices which have formed the foundation of Black history in the new world, but, it also means we must examine the mindsets and mentalities of Ancient Roman and Medieval societies. The prejudices and projections of those eras are…different from what we might expect, but writing about that time from a modern vantage poses all sorts of moral and epistemological quandaries. And that is before we even ask about whether any of this is real.

Alright…enough historicism. Above is Mauritius of Thebes AKA Saint Maurice, a third century Roman general who led the vaunted Theban Legion, an elite infantry squadron of a thousand Roman legionaries based in Egypt. Born around AD 250 in Thebes, Mauritius was a Coptic Christian, however he was also a Roman soldier who understood how to navigate the mélange of languages, cultures, and faiths at the borders of the vast empire. Or so it seemed–the third century was a time of profound crisis for the Roman Empire, and the Theban Legion was sent across the seas and high mountains to Alpine Gaul (modern Switzerland) to fight against rebels. These rebels were bagaudae, peasant insurgents who revolted against the mercurial rapacity of the Roman elites (who, in turn, found time and resources within the larger cycle of ruin, civil wars, and famine to crush the insurgents utterly). At a pass in the Alps (today known as the Great Saint Bernard Pass), Emperor Maximian ordered Mauritius’ legion to massacre some local Christians. When Mauritius refused to carry out the orders, the Theban legion was punished with decimation (every tenth man was executed), and when Mauritius refused Maximian’s order a second time, the Caesar ordered that Mauritius and all of his men be killed.
And that was it for Mauritius…or would have been except, as with Saint Nicholas, stories and legends began springing up around Mauritius after his death. As an Egyptian soldier in northern lands, Mauritius took on more and more fabulous trappings and appurtenances after his death. Maurice was said to have worn magnificent armor emblazoned with a red cross. He was reputed to have gone into battle bearing the holy lance, the spear which pierced Christ’s side. Otto I (here is his crown!) had Maurice’s sacred remains interred at the great cathedral of Magdeburg,
Soon Maurice was the patron saint of infantrymen, swordsmiths, weavers, alpine soldiers, gout sufferers, dyers, and (maybe best of all) Holy Roman Emperors! In the 12th century, as the German Empire entered a zenith, Maurice’s image was everywhere, and instead of being pictured as a stereotypical Roman, he was portrayed as an African dressed in armor. The rather splendid statue of Maurice at Magdeberg is a fine medieval example. Carved around 1250, the statue portrays Maurice in 13th century chainmail and with ebony skin and undisguised (and un-caricatured) Nubian features.

The Cult of Maurice became more prominent up until the mid-16th century when suddenly everything changed (as the burgeoning African slave trade spread its racist lies and cruel stereotypes to Germany, Bohemia, Austria, and Switzerland). Suddenly Maurice turned white (and less important within his own story)!
So, uh, who was Maurice? Was he a Roman soldier or a holy man? Was he Black or a Roman or an Egyptian or what? Why is he dressed as a 15th century German courtier? Was he even a real person? Unfortunately none of the answers to those questions are straightforward or even satisfactory. Neither Romans (some of whom were Black) nor Medieval lords (some of whom were Black) thought of race in the same way as 18th century plantation owners (some of whom were Black). Maurice could have been Black and Egyptian and a Roman general. Saint Maurice is thought of as the first black Christian Saint except for maybe, uh, Jesus, who is equally ambiguous and hard to pin down (and also maybe not real). If I had to guess, I would say Maurice was not real–or rather he was real in the way that Jesus was real: which is to say that there were indeed military commanders and problematic street rabbis roaming around the Roman world and Christian writers used these figures to tell the story they wanted to tell.

And what a story this is! At its heart, Saint Maurice’s story is a transcendent story of moral bravery and sacrifice. It is also a dangerous story capable of unending all social hierarchies. When the Emperor of known civilization gives one of his generals an order to kill innocent people, the soldier decides to give up his social standing, his men, and even his life rather than follow the unjust command. Such radical compassion is truly Christlike! It immediately illustrates that there are bigger things going on than rank, status, victory, empire..or even survival. Saint Maurice makes us think hard about human choices. It would be lovely to think that racial identity is likewise a fungible choice to be dispensed with in the face of larger moral imperatives, but, alas, in this world of continuing bigotry, such idealism is also apparently still a myth.
8 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 23, 2021 at 1:12 AM
EE
Fascinating! Thank you for sharing.
March 17, 2021 at 11:30 AM
Wayne
Saint Maurice really is a fascinating choice to be patron saint of Holy Roman Emperors…I feel like there is something going on with his story that we are still missing.
February 23, 2021 at 8:55 AM
K Hindall
Sigh . . .
You know, I’m really glad that George Floyd’s death was given the attention it deserved (I can’t believe kneeling on someone’s neck was ever considered an *acceptable* method of restraint!) and systemic racism is getting in the headlines and national consciousness, but . . . every time I see something like this, I wonder . . . “When is my minority going to get some actual understanding?”
That’s why I really don’t get why everyone says that “All Lives Matter” is the antithesis of “Black Lives Matter”. Surely black lives matter *because* all lives matter, yes? And if all lives do matter, why must we wait through an interminable line of specific lives mattering before we get to all lives mattering? How many people will die (if only from natural causes) while waiting in that line? Not to mention that saying any specific group of lives matter implies that there are lives that *don’t* matter—else where is the need to specify?—which surely we shouldn’t be even implying.
Also not to mention that human beings come in *one* color, thank you very much, and that color is brown (all the various “colors” being merely shades thereof).
I’m not trying to start a flame war, goodness knows, but it is one of the drawbacks of the “Black Lives Matter” movement. And as as a senior member of a waiting group (which one doesn’t matter), I am staring in the face the prospect of dying while in line.
And that hurts, people. My life has been one long scream to be taken seriously, and not only my group but many, many others are still waiting. . . .
February 23, 2021 at 10:51 AM
hooftales
K Hindall, i hear you. I am white, Anglo Saxon, Protestant in heritage and have never suffered involuntary material deprivation, all this through no fault (or virtue) of my own. But i have experienced injustice for myself, as has everyone, i think.
More importantly, and more keenly, i have witnessed the suffering and unjust treatment of those that i love so much that it feels worse than my own suffering. My problem is that the suffering that distresses me so much is not human suffering. It’s the suffering of non-human animals, plants, and whole ecosystems! I know that sounds maudlin and contrived but when i think about the 300,000 newborn humans that appear on the planet every 24 hours i am overcome with distress (even with increased levels of medication ha ha) To me it feels like what you say so eloquently: my life at least for the past 40 years has been one long scream to be taken seriously that humans are killing the planet, not because we as individuals are evil but just because there are too many of us. And there are too many of us because not enough of us think about or care about anything beyond ourselves. (One’s children are an extension of one’s self). What is the proper response when our much- loved fellow humans act so blindly? Do you say “congratulations!” to every new mother? or “oh my God, i’m so sorry to hear that!” Whether you scream or whisper, you risk a flame war (as you say) if you try to express the point of view that there is a larger level of concern beyond the human individual. Or worse than a flame war: people simply turn a deaf ear and dismiss the whispering OR screaming as the ravings of a misanthropic lunatic.
Lately i try to take comfort in my conclusion that there is still much beauty and goodness in the world, just as there is still beauty and goodness in a body struggling with cancer or some other serious disease. There is still much I can do to reduce suffering and injustice in the part of the world where i currently live, and in the bigger picture, there is still some hope that humans could “go into remission” and get back into balance with the rest of Creation. Whatever happens, in the long run, it’s not the outcome that matters, but what we learn along the way. that’s my story and i’m sticking to it! I apologize in advance if this offends anyone/ everyone.
February 23, 2021 at 7:19 PM
K Hindall
Well, yes. I certainly count nonhuman lives among those that matter. In fact, you won’t hear me arguing that human lives are worth more than nonhuman ones. We’ve behaved like we’re the center of the universe when we’re a destructive species on a tiny planet in a tiny corner of one of gazillions of galaxies in gazillions of universes. Our only distinction in our own neck of the woods is being the only single species in the planet’s history to bring on a major extinction event.
And personally when someone has a baby, my response is “How could you?!” We should be breeding endangered species, not humans, especially if we want any species on the planet (including our own) here a century from now. In fact, my medical alert bracelet says that there should be no treatment for any fatal issue because we need to reduce the number of humans as quickly as we possibly can, and I’m trying to put my behavior where my beliefs are.
But it would be nice for someone to take my difficulties seriously before that time comes. . . .
March 17, 2021 at 12:10 PM
Wayne
Thanks K Hindall. That is well said. I often think about how artwork which is popular right now will look in the future (art being symbolic of what people find most important or sacred). I have a feeling that future people will not look at Cindy Sherman or Jeff Koons and say “This perfectly contextualizes issues of cultural identity within a larger economic rubric” but instead they will say “why did people of the 21st century kill the oceans for this stupid junk?”
March 17, 2021 at 11:59 AM
Wayne
Racial and ethnic discrimination is irrational (since it is built on top of categories, which, as you note, are not really real or meaningful)… Yet, at the same time such discrimination is built on top of economic/social systems of oppression which existed in the past and seemed rational to the decision makers of those times (for example: Atlantic slave traders of the 17th and 18th century created all sorts of racist narratives and tropes about Africans in order to justify their evil trade). Understanding how the nuances of history disadvantaged certain groups is not at odds with the larger humanist goal of providing equal rights and equal opportunities to all people. But the nuances of how such identity-based movements play out in the present moment (and among larger populations of people who have been misinformed about history…or do not think a great deal about historiography) is frustrating because some of these social justice movements necessarily recapitulate and build upon the very same problematic (and constructed) ethnic identities and stereotypes which are the root of the problem. That is why I found it useful to look back before 1492 to see how differently Africans were thought of by Europeans before the propagandists and apologists of the Atlantic slave trade began creating pernicious & self-serving narratives about African inferiority.
February 26, 2021 at 5:49 PM
kingkang911
‘Mercurial rapacity’ takes the Oscar for me on this one. Great story btw.