Last night my roommate told me about bitcoins, a digital currency created two years ago by Satoshi Nakamoto, a shadowy entity who may be a financier, a programmer, or an anarchist (or he/she/it may not even be a person at all). The name “bitcoins” also refers to the software and built-in encryption features which allow the “coins” to be anonymously transferred while still retaining whatever “realness” they have. The concept initially filled me with unreasoning anger, but thinking about bitcoins has caused me to reflect more deeply on the notional nature of all money. Most dollars are no more real than bitcoins: only a tiny fraction of American legal tender exists in the real world (as the paper scraps or metal disks found in cash registers, laundry machines, money clips, dancers’ garters, underground hoards, piggy banks and what have you). The majority of money is ones and zeros zipping through huge servers run by large financial institutions–not really that different from bitcoins (although the dollar is backed by lots of important guys in suits and by a huge military rather than by the personal assurances of a Japanese cyberpunk shadowspawn).
Instead of thinking about today’s national currencies I like to reflect on currencies based on real objects but still not pegged to any use value. The rather beautiful giant stone coins of Yap are probably the most well-known example of such money, however, a more interesting and widespread example is provided by mollusk shells–which have been used as a medium of exchange by different societies worldwide throughout history. Over three thousand years ago the Chinese were using cowry shells as currency. It is said that the classical Chinese character for money was the same as for cowry (I am going to leave Chinese scholars to argue over the actual characters—trying to follow the vagaries of Chinese etymology left my head spinning). In Thailand the “bia” was a unit worth 1⁄6400 Baht and was literally a cowry (which was also a common counter used in gambling). On the East Cost of the United States, Iroquois and Algonquian tribesmen utilized “wampum” belts manufactured from littleneck clams to solidify treaties or as exchange for personal transactions. Tribes of the Pacific Northwest utilized tusk shells or scaphopods for their shell money. Different tribes of Australian aboriginal people utilized different shells as money and often regarded the money shells from other tribes as worthless. Other examples of shell currency are numerous and come from all parts of the world, but one is particularly instructive.
The most infamous use of shell currency may also have been the most complicated and lucrative. In the seventeenth, eighteenth, and early nineteenth centuries competing Dutch, Portuguese, English, and French slave traders utilized cowry shells as a common medium of exchange (among several others) to buy slaves along the African coast. The slaves were sold by local rulers who obtained them in internecine tribal wars or by Arab merchants who specialized in mass kidnappings. The cowrie shells used in such transactions originated from the Maldives and later from Zanzibar. They were carried to the Mediterranean and to the Sahara by Arab traders and to Europe by merchants from the miscellaneous colonial powers. The potential “mark-up” on such shells was tremendous since one could obtain then easily from living snails in the Indian Ocean and then exchange them for living people in the Bight of Benin.
My personal feelings about international trade are not as negative as this grim historical example would seem to indicate (I feel that today global trade is, on balance, more likely to deliver people from slavery than into it). However I feel that this example is a good metaphor for the central mystery of money. Cowry shells are pretty and have been used for rituals, games, and adornments for a long time–but their value does not seem intrinsic in any special way–except maybe to living cowries. Indeed the monetized mystique such shells had in the eighteenth century is long gone: I found many web sites which will sell you barrels of money cowrie shells for next to nothing. What is the magic that makes shells worth a human life in one era and a quasi-worthless novelty in another? I have no answer other than to point at the strange epic that is history. I suspect that the smug Federal Reserve Board members discontentedly shaking their heads at the tone of this article do not have one either. Money is a fairly obvious illusion…and yet you will never live your life outside its thrall.
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 25, 2011 at 10:20 AM
Zeke
All currencies are based on trust. Bitcoin’s distributed trust system is an elegant solution to the problem of how to establish trust when there’s no central authority. Critics might argue that’s a problem we don’t have at the moment, and are unlikely to find in the near future.
Look too closely and you’ll see a lot of base human motives in this bitcoin frenzy — greed, profit at the expense of one’s neighbor, misguided principles — but on a macro scale, cryptocurrencies are at least theoretically capable of amazing things. Money that exists outside the control of governments can only be a good thing for individual freedoms, even if we still keep our gov’ts. And I mean the most fundamental freedoms, to direct one’s own labor and reap the benefits.
At the moment, and possibly forever, bitcoin velocity consists mostly of speculative trading between bitcoin and gov’t-backed currency positions. I suspect that bitcoin’s creators are sitting on a huge horde of bitcoins and slowly selling them off in the markets to rubes such as myself. Yet demand for the algorithmically generated numbers appears unquenched for now. Yesterday, after purchasing 10 bitcoins in a range from 6.6 – 6.8 dollars each, I put in a limit order for another 50 at $5/ea. just in case. However, the exchange between bitcoins and paypal dollars today is already at 7.5 ppd / bc, so my trade is unlikely to find any takers.
May 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM
Hieronymo
Maritime traders with access to Zanzibar and the Maldives had a more or less unlimited source of cowries to trade with Africans who misapprehended the rarity of the shells. It seems like the rarity of bitcoins might be a misapprehension as well. Dollars, thalers, and florins have had hidden weaknesses and strengths (the price of gold, hidden debts, bond market fluctuations, political strife, and so forth) but the creators of these currencies continued working to maintain transparency about the actual basis of value. This transparency–“trust”, as you very cogently put it–is the real value of the currencies. I find it hard to trust currencies that don’t have addresses. I know where to find the Medicis and the Federal Reserve but I can’t say the same about Portuguese slavers and completely unknown cyber entities.
Of course there are larger issues afoot. Currencies are red herrings anyway–they are truly meant to foster economic, social, and scientific growth (at least that is their purpose in the eyes of good utilitarians). I suppose it could be argued that the slave cowries went on to be socially useful in the African hinterlands where they were traded for goods and services and thereby created economic value or infrastructure. Perhaps the bitcoins are spurring useful economic activity somewhere on the web and are not merely a medium of pyramidal speculation or a foil for criminal activity. Perhaps…
At any rate, thank you for clarifying some of the language and technical details about bitcoins. Although I find their provenance a bit murky (and am having some fun at Satoshi Nakamoto’s expense), my purpose is not really to lambast bitcoins or any other pseudo-currency. Instead I am using the subject as a springboard to write about the larger theme of this thread–humankind’s strange relationship with mollusks. Since this quixotic pursuit has lead me to the unfamiliar and uncomfortable realm of writing about money, I hope I am not stepping on the toes of any economists or speculators. I would really hate to do that!
May 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM
Zeke
To date the most successful bitcoin store sells only alpaca socks…
http://www.grasshillalpacas.com/alpacaproductsforbitcoinoffer.html
May 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM
Diana
Apparently some researchers (with permission) took a large coin from Yap with the intent to bring it to the US (or somewhere in the West, I can’t remember) with the intention of bringing it back to Yap after they showed it around. There was a big storm and the crew had to dump the coin to survive. They went back to Yap and broke the bad new to the locals, who told them it was no problem at all — that they could still own that coin, and trade with that coin, and it will just be known as the coin at the bottom of the ocean.
May 26, 2011 at 11:44 AM
Hieronymo
That’s a beautiful story for a beautiful currency. The Yap coins have always combined the best elements of money, abstract statuary, and megalithic cromlechs. I sort of shoehorned them into this essay because I like them so much.
August 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM
Valerie
Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your site. You have some really great posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some content for your blog in exchange
for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if
interested. Cheers!