Many of the greatest medieval artists are anonymous. Their actual names and personalities have been lost in the swirl of time and only their works remain. In such cases the unknown masters come to be named after their region, or a distinctive trademark, or (as in this case) one famous painting. This is how today’s featured gothic artist came to share a title with Lucifer himself. The trecento Siennese master who painted this panel is known by two surviving works (which are both at the Louvre). The more influential and dramatic of the pair is The Fall of the Rebel Angels which was painted between 1340 and 1345 AD. The painter is therefore called the “Master of the Rebel Angels”. Here is the best digital image I could find of the painting—itself a portion of a long lost poyptych (the other surviving portion is a picture of Saint Martin, the patron saint of France—which suggests the work was made for a French buyer). This work had a deep influence on French Art and was often copied or imitated—most notably by the Limbourg brothers for the illuminated manuscript Les Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry.
In a world without quicksilver mirrors, abundant cheap plate glass, or artificial lighting there was only one substance that conveyed divine luster in a lasting manner—actual gold. The majority of the The Fall of the Rebel Angels is pure elemental gold flattened out into sheets and affixed directly to the panel. This precious but inhuman metallic background provides a perfect setting for the larger than life metaphysical battle portrayed in the painting. The story behind this artwork is immediately comprehensible to anyone who chafes under rules: the rebel angels come to believe they would be better off running their own affairs instead of submitting to the hegemony of heaven. God and his hosts of loyal angels learn of their disloyalty and cast them down. Without the naturalistic conventions of Renaissance art (which would come later) the war in heaven takes on an otherworldly almost science-fiction aspect. The glowing armored hosts of heaven guard the welkin. Above them are the enthroned ranks of saints. God towers at the pinnacle of the composition, serene on a living throne of flame-like angel wings.
The rebel angels have lost their heavenly beauty and their effulgence. Blackened and monstrous, unable to bear their weight on corrupted wings, they fall from the skies and are swallowed by a mysterious drab gray orb. This dull circle represents life and the affairs of the world. The artist meant us to understand that we too are its inhabitants, fallen like the rebel angels and cut off from what is numinous and ineffable. The painting starkly conveys the hierarchical philosophical outlook of the times, but strangely it also makes the rebel angels sympathetic. They are the subjects of the work: their mutilation and defeat provides the drama. Christian art reversed the conventions of Greco/Roman art: the victim or acted-upon party is the protagonist (rather than the victorious aggressor). I can’t imagine the Master of the Rebel Angels intended such a result, but, somehow he painted a work where the monsters are the protagonists and their transformation is the dominant mystery.
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 21, 2011 at 1:46 PM
Zeke
Did the other panels of the lost polypthych involve a guild navigator and sand worms? This reminds me of David Lynch’s Dune aesthetic.
January 21, 2011 at 6:08 PM
Hieronymo
David Lynch and science fiction have both borrowed heavily from medieval religious artwork. Gothic paintings are among the more vivid and intense manifestations of the human imagination.
January 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM
jenny
I like this very much.
I’m sorry to comment so frequently from a single perspective, but here goes again: There is a classic narrative poem by Lermontov called Demon. It has now been adapted for the stage by the explosively imaginative Dmitri Krymov (Demon. View from Above).
The audience sits above the performance space and views the world, played out by actors and painters, as the demon would: all so small, all so temporary.
http://www.krymov.org/performances/demon/
It is surely only a matter of time before Krymov comes to NY, so watch for him. He also has a terrific piece about Shostakovich.
January 24, 2011 at 8:22 PM
Hieronymo
Ooh! Thanks for the reference and for the theater tip. Krymov sounds like a dramatist after my own heart.